Gazzo v Crimi [2008] NSWSC 217

Gazzo v Crimi [2008] NSWSC 217

Mrs Gazzo was an eligible person and a daughter whom the deceased ought to have contemplated as having a legitimate claim on her bounty. She received no provision from the deceased during life, and she and her husband had made contributions for the benefit of the deceased and family. Although Leonardo Gazzo had a moral obligation to make the mortgage repayments, the mortgage liability was that of Mr and Mrs Gazzo. A legacy of $150,000 out of the notional estate was proper provision because it would enable Mrs Gazzo to clear the mortgage on her home and continue to live in modest circumstances.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
17 March 2008
Procedural Posture
Family Provision Application Under the Family Provision Act 1982 / Principal Judgment After Hearing; Parties to Bring in Short Minutes of Order
Outcome
Provision ordered in favour of Mrs Gazzo by way of a legacy of $150,000 out of the notional estate, with final terms of orders to be settled after hearing the parties.
Legal Topics
['failure to Make Provision' 'eligible Person' 'notional Estate' 'proper Maintenance, Education or Advancement in Life' 'provision for Adult Child']
['succession' 'family Provision'] ['failure to Make Provision' 'eligible Person' 'notional Estate' 'proper Maintenance, Education or Advancement in Life' 'provision for Adult Child']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Family Provision Application Under the Family Provision Act 1982 / Principal Judgment After Hearing; Parties to Bring in Short Minutes of Order

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether Mrs Gazzo, as a child of the deceased, was left without adequate provision for her proper maintenance, education and advancement in life.' 'What provision, if any, ought to be made for Mrs Gazzo out of the estate or notional estate.' "Whether a legacy sufficient to discharge the mortgage on Mrs Gazzo's home was proper provision, notwithstanding that the mortgage arose from a guarantee of her son's business."]

Ratio Decidendi

Mrs Gazzo was an eligible person and a daughter whom the deceased ought to have contemplated as having a legitimate claim on her bounty. She received no provision from the deceased during life, and she and her husband had made contributions for the benefit of the deceased and family. Although Leonardo Gazzo had a moral obligation to make the mortgage repayments, the mortgage liability was that of Mr and Mrs Gazzo. A legacy of $150,000 out of the notional estate was proper provision because it would enable Mrs Gazzo to clear the mortgage on her home and continue to live in modest circumstances.

Court Disposition

Provision ordered in favour of Mrs Gazzo by way of a legacy of $150,000 out of the notional estate, with final terms of orders to be settled after hearing the parties.

Orders

  • ['Legacy of $150,000 out of the notional estate in favour of Agata Gazzo.' 'Parties to be heard on the appropriate terms of orders, including whether interest should be payable on the $150,000 legacy if not paid by a specified date.' 'Parties to be heard on whether the notional estate should be limited to the extent...