Ageist Pty Ltd v Samuel M Holdings Pty Ltd (Receiver and Manager Appointed) [2021] NSWSC 988

Ageist Pty Ltd v Samuel M Holdings Pty Ltd (Receiver and Manager Appointed) [2021] NSWSC 988

The caveats lodged by the defendants failed to establish a caveatable interest based on proprietary or equitable grounds, and the evidence did not support the asserted bad faith by the plaintiff as mortgagee in the exercise of its power of sale. Even assuming a serious issue to be tried, the balance of convenience overwhelmingly favoured withdrawal of caveats to avoid prejudice to mortgagee, first mortgagee, and third-party purchaser, given no valuable undertaking could be offered and substantial deficit remained after sale. Restraint ordered on lodging further caveats without leave; broader restraint denied due to inadequate evidentiary foundation.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
06 August 2021
Procedural Posture
Amended Summons (equity, Caveat Withdrawal), / Final Determination—interlocutory Application
Outcome
Caveats ordered withdrawn; defendants restrained from lodging further caveats without leave; broader restraint on interference with sale denied; costs submissions reserved.
Legal Topics
['caveats' "mortgagee's Power of Sale" 'good Faith Duty' 'interlocutory Injunctions' 'beneficial Interest' 'trusts' 'receivership']
['land Law' 'equity' 'property Law'] ['caveats' "mortgagee's Power of Sale" 'good Faith Duty' 'interlocutory Injunctions' 'beneficial Interest' 'trusts' 'receivership']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Amended Summons (equity, Caveat Withdrawal), / Final Determination—interlocutory Application

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether caveats lodged by defendants against Port Kembla property should be withdrawn under s 74MA Real Property Act 1900 (NSW)' 'Whether defendants should be restrained from lodging further caveats without leave' 'Whether mortgagee exercised power of sale in bad faith' 'Whether caveators had caveatable interests on basis of alleged proprietary and beneficial interests, and alleged bad faith']

Ratio Decidendi

The caveats lodged by the defendants failed to establish a caveatable interest based on proprietary or equitable grounds, and the evidence did not support the asserted bad faith by the plaintiff as mortgagee in the exercise of its power of sale. Even assuming a serious issue to be tried, the balance of convenience overwhelmingly favoured withdrawal of caveats to avoid prejudice to mortgagee, first mortgagee, and third-party purchaser, given no valuable undertaking could be offered and substantial deficit remained after sale. Restraint ordered on lodging further caveats without leave; broader restraint denied due to inadequate evidentiary foundation.

Court Disposition

Caveats ordered withdrawn; defendants restrained from lodging further caveats without leave; broader restraint on interference with sale denied; costs submissions reserved.

Orders

  • ['First defendant by its Receiver or director to withdraw caveat AR256711 over Port Kembla property' 'Second and third defendants to withdraw caveat AR265339 over Port Kembla property' "First defendant's director, second and third defendants restrained from lodging further caveats on Port Kembla property without...