Dalgety & Company Limited v Gray [1919] UKPCHCA 4
The alleged oral agreement was unenforceable as it amounted to a contract to create an interest in land, which must be in writing under the Statute of Frauds (Instruments Act 1890 (Vict.), sec. 208); accordingly, the trial Judge was correct in withdrawing the case from the jury, and the suit should have been dismissed.
- Parties
- Appellant; Defendant: Dalgety & Company Limited; Respondent; Plaintiff: Gray
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 May 1919
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Appeal From the High Court to the Privy Council
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Agency, Statute of Frauds, Agreements Concerning Interests in Land, Mortgages, Oral Contracts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dalgety & Company Limited
Appellant; Defendant
Gray
Respondent; Plaintiff
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Appeal From the High Court to the Privy Council
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an oral agreement to procure a loan secured by mortgage is enforceable under the Statute of Frauds (Instruments Act 1890 (Vict.), sec. 208)
- 2 Whether such an agreement creates an interest in land and therefore must be in writing
- 3 Whether the agent (defendant) could lawfully lend the balance of funds himself without conflict of interest
Ratio Decidendi
The alleged oral agreement was unenforceable as it amounted to a contract to create an interest in land, which must be in writing under the Statute of Frauds (Instruments Act 1890 (Vict.), sec. 208); accordingly, the trial Judge was correct in withdrawing the case from the jury, and the suit should have been dismissed.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Restoration of the judgment of the trial Judge at first instance (for defendants)
- Defendants to have their costs in all courts and before the Privy Council
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment