AGF v R [2016] NSWCCA 236
Applicant's sentence was reduced by 10% to reflect substantial assistance to authorities not brought to the attention of the sentencing judge, with leave to appeal granted and new sentences imposed. The prior conviction being quashed did not materially affect sentence as it was not treated as aggravating.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 October 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Court of Criminal Appeal, Leave to Appeal and Re Sentencing
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; sentences re-imposed
- Legal Topics
- ['appeal Against Sentence' 'child Sexual Assault' 'sentencing Principles' 'fresh and New Evidence' 'assistance to Authorities']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Criminal Appeal, Leave to Appeal and Re Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether failure to adduce evidence of assistance to authorities during sentencing amounted to a miscarriage of justice' 'Whether sentencing judge erred by dealing with applicant on basis of prior conviction later quashed']
Ratio Decidendi
Applicant's sentence was reduced by 10% to reflect substantial assistance to authorities not brought to the attention of the sentencing judge, with leave to appeal granted and new sentences imposed. The prior conviction being quashed did not materially affect sentence as it was not treated as aggravating.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; sentences re-imposed
Orders
- ['Time to file Notice of Application for Leave to Appeal extended to 1 June 2016.' 'Leave to appeal granted and appeal allowed.' 'Sentences imposed in the District Court on 6 November 2009 quashed and new sentences imposed for each count as specified.' 'Order that Confidential Exhibit A be returned to the Crown.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment