R v Nasrallah [2022] NSWDC 54
The appropriate sentence is a full-time custodial term of three years and six months with a non-parole period of two years for an aggravated (in company) assault with intent to rob and inflict actual bodily harm, taking into account the offender’s significant criminal history, use of a weapon, commission in company and while on conditional liberty, but moderating for his early guilty plea, demonstrated deprivation in childhood, mental health and substance abuse issues, the impact of COVID-19 custodial conditions, reduced moral culpability per Bugmy principles, and the need for parity with the co-offender.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Director of Public Prosecution (Crown); Offender: Hussein Nasrallah
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 March 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentence
- Outcome
- Full-time custodial sentence imposed; special circumstances found.
- Legal Topics
- Aggravated Assault, Robbery, Actual Bodily Harm, Sentencing, Joint Criminal Enterprise, Parity, Bugmy Principles
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Director of Public Prosecution (Crown)
Prosecution
Hussein Nasrallah
Offender
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the appropriate sentence for aggravated (in company) assault with intent to rob and inflict actual bodily harm under s 95(1) of the Crimes Act 1900?
- 2 To what extent do the offender’s background, mental health, prior criminal history, and the COVID-19 custodial environment mitigate sentence severity?
- 3 How do principles of parity and Bugmy principles impact sentencing in this case involving joint enterprise?
Ratio Decidendi
The appropriate sentence is a full-time custodial term of three years and six months with a non-parole period of two years for an aggravated (in company) assault with intent to rob and inflict actual bodily harm, taking into account the offender’s significant criminal history, use of a weapon, commission in company and while on conditional liberty, but moderating for his early guilty plea, demonstrated deprivation in childhood, mental health and substance abuse issues, the impact of COVID-19 custodial conditions, reduced moral culpability per Bugmy principles, and the need for parity with the co-offender.
Court Disposition
Full-time custodial sentence imposed; special circumstances found.
Orders
- Offender convicted of aggravated assault with intent to rob and recklessly inflict actual bodily harm (s 95(1) Crimes Act 1900).
- Sentenced to three years and six months’ imprisonment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment