R v Whalan [2021] NSWDC 812
The aggregate sentence imposed reflects consideration of the principle of totality, causes and effects of recidivism and institutionalisation, parity with the co-offender, the low objective seriousness of most offences, and special circumstances warranting a finding for extended supervision and rehabilitation, balanced against specific and general deterrence due to the offender’s repeated criminal history.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Crown; Offender: Shaun Whalan
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 September 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentence
- Outcome
- conviction and sentence
- Legal Topics
- Aggravated Break and Enter, Recidivism, Domestic Violence, Sentencing Aggregate, Parity Principle
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Crown
Prosecutor
Shaun Whalan
Offender
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriateness of aggregate sentencing for multiple offences including aggravated break and enter, intimidation, property offences, and possess prohibited drug
- 2 Assessment of objective seriousness of each offence
- 3 Application of sentencing principles including totality, parity, and specific/general deterrence
Ratio Decidendi
The aggregate sentence imposed reflects consideration of the principle of totality, causes and effects of recidivism and institutionalisation, parity with the co-offender, the low objective seriousness of most offences, and special circumstances warranting a finding for extended supervision and rehabilitation, balanced against specific and general deterrence due to the offender’s repeated criminal history.
Court Disposition
conviction and sentence
Orders
- Aggregate sentence of 4 years imprisonment imposed
- Finding of special circumstances made; non-parole period set at 2 years from 29 June 2020
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment