R v Enosa [2011] NSWDC 139
A custodial sentence of five years with a non-parole period of two years and six months is appropriate for aggravated break, enter and steal where the offender played a significant role in a joint criminal enterprise with aggravating circumstances, but demonstrated remorse and prospects of rehabilitation. The standard non-parole period is varied due to special circumstances including rehabilitation prospects and need for supervised parole.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 March 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentence
- Outcome
- offender convicted and sentenced to imprisonment
- Legal Topics
- ['aggravated Break Enter and Steal' 'sentencing' 'non Parole Period' 'joint Criminal Enterprise' 'aggravation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Appropriate sentence for aggravated break, enter and steal under s 112(2) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW)' 'Applicability of standard non-parole period' 'Impact of guilty plea timing and utilitarian discount' 'Consideration of subjective factors and prospects of rehabilitation' 'Whether special circumstances exist justifying variation of standard non-parole period']
Ratio Decidendi
A custodial sentence of five years with a non-parole period of two years and six months is appropriate for aggravated break, enter and steal where the offender played a significant role in a joint criminal enterprise with aggravating circumstances, but demonstrated remorse and prospects of rehabilitation. The standard non-parole period is varied due to special circumstances including rehabilitation prospects and need for supervised parole.
Court Disposition
offender convicted and sentenced to imprisonment
Orders
- ['The offender is convicted and sentenced to imprisonment for five years.' 'A non-parole period of two years and six months is set.' 'The sentence is to commence on 23 October 2009.' 'The earliest date for parole eligibility is 22 April 2012.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment