R v Glare [2014] NSWDC 298
An aggregate sentence of three years imprisonment, with a non-parole period of 18 months, is appropriate in light of the objective and subjective features of the offending, the guilty plea at the earliest opportunity, the offender's remorse, commitment to rehabilitation, lack of relevant criminal record, and the need for supervision and rehabilitation upon release. Sentences for individual offences were calculated, aggregated, and then discounted by 40%. Special circumstances allow for a reduced ratio between head sentence and non-parole period.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Regina (Crown); Offender: Christopher James Glare
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 October 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentencing / Sentencing Decision
- Outcome
- convicted and sentenced
- Legal Topics
- Aggravated Break, Enter and Steal, Aggravated Break and Enter With Intent to Commit a Serious Indictable Offence, Possess Housebreaking Implements, Receive Stolen Property, Larceny, Enter Building With Intent to Commit Serious Indictable Offence, Deal With Proceeds of Crime, Aggregate Sentencing, Parole, Rehabilitation, Drug Addiction and Offending, Sentence Discount
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina (Crown)
Prosecutor
Christopher James Glare
Offender
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentencing / Sentencing Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate sentence for seven offences including aggravated break, enter and steal, break and enter with intent, possessing housebreaking implements, receiving stolen property, larceny, dealing with proceeds of crime, and related offences
- 2 Consideration of mitigating factors such as remorse, rehabilitation, lack of relevant prior criminality, plea of guilty
- 3 Application of sentence discounts for early plea and cooperation
Ratio Decidendi
An aggregate sentence of three years imprisonment, with a non-parole period of 18 months, is appropriate in light of the objective and subjective features of the offending, the guilty plea at the earliest opportunity, the offender's remorse, commitment to rehabilitation, lack of relevant criminal record, and the need for supervision and rehabilitation upon release. Sentences for individual offences were calculated, aggregated, and then discounted by 40%. Special circumstances allow for a reduced ratio between head sentence and non-parole period.
Court Disposition
convicted and sentenced
Orders
- Aggregate sentence of three years imprisonment commencing 30 March 2014 and expiring 29 March 2017.
- Non-parole period of 18 months commencing 30 March 2014 and expiring 29 September 2015.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment