R v MS (No 2) [2020] NSWDC 772
The offending falls just above the mid-range of objective gravity for offences of this nature. There is significant overlap between abuse of trust and abuse of authority in this case, such that finding a separate breach of trust would result in double counting. The sentence must reflect community abhorrence and serve general deterrence, with special circumstances warranting deviation from the statutory ratio.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 December 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- Offender sentenced to imprisonment for 6 years with a non-parole period of 4 years.
- Legal Topics
- ['aggravated Sexual Intercourse' 'child Sexual Offences' 'sentencing' 'breach of Trust' 'abuse of Authority' 'general Deterrence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether abuse of trust and abuse of authority are different concepts' 'Whether abuse of trust can be an aggravating factor when abuse of authority is an element of the offence' 'Determination of objective seriousness of the offending' 'Appropriateness of general deterrence in sentencing' 'Identification of special circumstances for deviation from statutory ratio']
Ratio Decidendi
The offending falls just above the mid-range of objective gravity for offences of this nature. There is significant overlap between abuse of trust and abuse of authority in this case, such that finding a separate breach of trust would result in double counting. The sentence must reflect community abhorrence and serve general deterrence, with special circumstances warranting deviation from the statutory ratio.
Court Disposition
Offender sentenced to imprisonment for 6 years with a non-parole period of 4 years.
Orders
- ['Sentence of imprisonment for 6 years, backdated to 19 September 2018.' 'Non-parole period of 4 years, expiring 18 September 2022.' 'Head sentence expires 18 September 2024.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment