Marks v Pope [2001] NSWSC 105
On a proper construction of the will, the share of capital passes to the children of the daughters who died with issue, and not to the next of kin or by intestacy. The express trust arrangement indicated eligibility, and arguments that would lead to perpetual circularity or partial intestacy were rejected in favour of the interpretation that preserved the intended class gifts.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 March 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Succession (will Construction) / Judgment After Hearing
- Outcome
- Disputed half share of capital passes to the children of the daughters who died with issue.
- Legal Topics
- ['will Construction' 'gift Over Clauses' 'class Gifts' 'trust Administration' 'intestacy']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Succession (will Construction) / Judgment After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Construction of the words 'other daughters' in a testamentary trust" "Entitlement to the one-half share of capital under testator's will" 'Whether there is a partial intestacy']
Ratio Decidendi
On a proper construction of the will, the share of capital passes to the children of the daughters who died with issue, and not to the next of kin or by intestacy. The express trust arrangement indicated eligibility, and arguments that would lead to perpetual circularity or partial intestacy were rejected in favour of the interpretation that preserved the intended class gifts.
Court Disposition
Disputed half share of capital passes to the children of the daughters who died with issue.
Orders
- ["Appropriate short minutes of order to be brought in by first defendants' counsel; costs to be argued at a later hearing."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment