Agripower Barraba Pty Ltd v Blomfield (No 2) [2015] NSWCA 49
Given that each party enjoyed some success and the costs of the motion to adduce further evidence were separately ordered, there is no reason to depart from the previous decision that there be no order as to costs of the appeal apart from awarding costs to respondents for the motion.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 March 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Post Judgment Orders Regarding Costs
- Outcome
- Motion to adduce further evidence dismissed; respondents awarded costs for motion; no order otherwise as to costs of appeal.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs' 'adducing Further Evidence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Post Judgment Orders Regarding Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Appropriate order as to costs of appeal' 'Entitlement to costs of motion to adduce further evidence']
Ratio Decidendi
Given that each party enjoyed some success and the costs of the motion to adduce further evidence were separately ordered, there is no reason to depart from the previous decision that there be no order as to costs of the appeal apart from awarding costs to respondents for the motion.
Court Disposition
Motion to adduce further evidence dismissed; respondents awarded costs for motion; no order otherwise as to costs of appeal.
Orders
- ["Agripower's motion to adduce further evidence is dismissed." "Agripower pay the respondents' costs of Agripower's motion to adduce further evidence." 'Otherwise there be no order as to the costs of the appeal.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment