Conway (a pseudonym) v Secretary, Department of Home Affairs [2024] FCA 1348
Applicant achieved practical success; respondents to pay 80 percent of applicant's costs, assessed on the ordinary basis, with set-off permitted for previous costs owed, due to applicant's unreasonable conduct in negotiations and absence of exceptional circumstances justifying indemnity costs.
- Parties
- Applicant: Agustin Conway (a pseudonym); First Respondent: Secretary, Department of Home Affairs; Second Respondent: Minister for Home Affairs
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 November 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Law Proceeding / Post Discontinuance, Costs Determination
- Outcome
- Respondents ordered to pay 80 percent of applicant's costs with permission to set off unpaid costs from previous proceedings.
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Mandamus, Habeas Corpus, Immigration Detention, Discontinuance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Agustin Conway (a pseudonym)
Applicant
Secretary, Department of Home Affairs
First Respondent
Minister for Home Affairs
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Administrative Law Proceeding / Post Discontinuance, Costs Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether applicant is entitled to costs after discontinuance of proceedings
- 2 Appropriate basis for costs assessment (indemnity vs ordinary)
- 3 Entitlement to costs for applications for mandamus and habeas corpus
Ratio Decidendi
Applicant achieved practical success; respondents to pay 80 percent of applicant's costs, assessed on the ordinary basis, with set-off permitted for previous costs owed, due to applicant's unreasonable conduct in negotiations and absence of exceptional circumstances justifying indemnity costs.
Court Disposition
Respondents ordered to pay 80 percent of applicant's costs with permission to set off unpaid costs from previous proceedings.
Orders
- The respondents pay 80 percent of the applicant's costs of the proceeding, to be assessed if not agreed.
- The respondents be entitled to set off the sum of $5,600, payable by the applicant by way of costs in proceeding SAD316/2013, against the amount payable pursuant to order 2(a).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment