Novartis AG v Agvantage Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 160
The communications between the parties before the proceeding do not support a conclusion that the applicant acted unreasonably, and there is no basis to say one party would have certainly succeeded if the application had been contested; therefore, each party should bear its own costs.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 February 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Preliminary Discovery / Costs Determination
- Outcome
- Each party to bear its own costs. Originating application otherwise dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['preliminary Discovery' 'patent Infringement' 'costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Preliminary Discovery / Costs Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the applicants acted unreasonably in bringing the application for preliminary discovery' 'Which party should bear the costs of the originating application']
Ratio Decidendi
The communications between the parties before the proceeding do not support a conclusion that the applicant acted unreasonably, and there is no basis to say one party would have certainly succeeded if the application had been contested; therefore, each party should bear its own costs.
Court Disposition
Each party to bear its own costs. Originating application otherwise dismissed.
Orders
- ['Each party is to bear its own costs in respect of the originating application filed on 27 January 2012.' 'The originating application filed on 27 January 2012 be otherwise dismissed.' 'Orders relating to provision of sample for expert testing, confidentiality undertaking, and notification requirements as per...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment