Baxter v Ah Way [1909] HCA 30

Baxter v Ah Way [1909] HCA 30

Section 52, sub-section (g) of the Customs Act 1901 is conditional legislation, not an unconstitutional delegation of legislative power. The Parliament provides the legislative framework, and the Governor-General in Council exercises discretion to specify goods subject to prohibition. The proclamation prohibiting the importation of opium suitable for smoking is valid.

Parties
Complainant: Baxter; Defendant: Ah Way
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
20 May 1909
Procedural Posture
Prosecution Under the Customs Act 1901 / Question of Law Reserved by Higgins J. for the Opinion of the Full Court
Outcome
The question submitted answered in the affirmative: the proclamation is valid.
Legal Topics
Conditional Legislation, Delegation of Legislative Power, Prohibited Imports, Statutory Interpretation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 21 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Baxter

Complainant

Ah Way

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Prosecution Under the Customs Act 1901 / Question of Law Reserved by Higgins J. for the Opinion of the Full Court

  1. 1 Is the proclamation by the Governor-General in Council prohibiting the importation of opium suitable for smoking valid under the Customs Act 1901 and the Constitution?
  2. 2 Does section 52, sub-section (g) of the Customs Act 1901 constitute an invalid delegation of legislative power?
  3. 3 Does section 53 of the Customs Act 1901 impliedly exclude opium from the general prohibition power of section 52, sub-section (g)?

Ratio Decidendi

Section 52, sub-section (g) of the Customs Act 1901 is conditional legislation, not an unconstitutional delegation of legislative power. The Parliament provides the legislative framework, and the Governor-General in Council exercises discretion to specify goods subject to prohibition. The proclamation prohibiting the importation of opium suitable for smoking is valid.

Court Disposition

The question submitted answered in the affirmative: the proclamation is valid.

Orders

  • The question of law reserved is answered in the affirmative: the Governor-General's proclamation prohibiting the importation of opium suitable for smoking was valid.
  • The question of costs was referred to Higgins J. with the opinion of the Court.