Baxter v Ah Way [1909] HCA 30
Section 52, sub-section (g) of the Customs Act 1901 is conditional legislation, not an unconstitutional delegation of legislative power. The Parliament provides the legislative framework, and the Governor-General in Council exercises discretion to specify goods subject to prohibition. The proclamation prohibiting the importation of opium suitable for smoking is valid.
- Parties
- Complainant: Baxter; Defendant: Ah Way
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 May 1909
- Procedural Posture
- Prosecution Under the Customs Act 1901 / Question of Law Reserved by Higgins J. for the Opinion of the Full Court
- Outcome
- The question submitted answered in the affirmative: the proclamation is valid.
- Legal Topics
- Conditional Legislation, Delegation of Legislative Power, Prohibited Imports, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Baxter
Complainant
Ah Way
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Prosecution Under the Customs Act 1901 / Question of Law Reserved by Higgins J. for the Opinion of the Full Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Is the proclamation by the Governor-General in Council prohibiting the importation of opium suitable for smoking valid under the Customs Act 1901 and the Constitution?
- 2 Does section 52, sub-section (g) of the Customs Act 1901 constitute an invalid delegation of legislative power?
- 3 Does section 53 of the Customs Act 1901 impliedly exclude opium from the general prohibition power of section 52, sub-section (g)?
Ratio Decidendi
Section 52, sub-section (g) of the Customs Act 1901 is conditional legislation, not an unconstitutional delegation of legislative power. The Parliament provides the legislative framework, and the Governor-General in Council exercises discretion to specify goods subject to prohibition. The proclamation prohibiting the importation of opium suitable for smoking is valid.
Court Disposition
The question submitted answered in the affirmative: the proclamation is valid.
Orders
- The question of law reserved is answered in the affirmative: the Governor-General's proclamation prohibiting the importation of opium suitable for smoking was valid.
- The question of costs was referred to Higgins J. with the opinion of the Court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment