R v Doudar [2020] NSWSC 1262
The sentence for Mr Doudar as accessory after the fact to murder was determined based on moderate objective seriousness and high moral culpability, a 10% reduction for guilty plea pursuant to Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 s 25D(4)(a), and lack of mitigating subjective factors.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 September 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- Imprisonment
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'accessory After the Fact to Murder' 'statutory Interpretation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What is the appropriate sentence for being an accessory after the fact to murder?' 'How should the utilitarian discount for a guilty plea be applied under Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 s 25D(4)(a)?']
Ratio Decidendi
The sentence for Mr Doudar as accessory after the fact to murder was determined based on moderate objective seriousness and high moral culpability, a 10% reduction for guilty plea pursuant to Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 s 25D(4)(a), and lack of mitigating subjective factors.
Court Disposition
Imprisonment
Orders
- ['Ahmad Doudar is sentenced to imprisonment for a term of 4 years and 6 months, with a non-parole period of 3 years and 4 months.' 'Sentence is dated from 17 August 2018.' 'Non-parole period expires on 16 December 2021.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment