Nazzal v 1Quay Corp Pty Ltd & Anor [2022] NSWSC 848
Where a contract provides an entitlement to indemnity costs, the court will usually exercise its discretion to make an order for indemnity costs in accordance with that entitlement. Interest is payable at the contractual rate as agreed in the Deed and Amendment Deed.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Ahmad Nazzal; First Defendant: 1Quay Corp Pty Ltd; Second Defendant: Iman Yassin
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 June 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Equity / Post Judgment Orders as to Interest and Costs
- Outcome
- Orders made for payment of interest and indemnity costs in favour of the plaintiff.
- Legal Topics
- Interest at Default Contractual Rate, Costs, Indemnity Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ahmad Nazzal
Plaintiff
1Quay Corp Pty Ltd
First Defendant
Iman Yassin
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Equity / Post Judgment Orders as to Interest and Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether plaintiff is entitled to interest at the default contractual rate
- 2 Whether indemnity costs should be awarded based on contractual entitlement
Ratio Decidendi
Where a contract provides an entitlement to indemnity costs, the court will usually exercise its discretion to make an order for indemnity costs in accordance with that entitlement. Interest is payable at the contractual rate as agreed in the Deed and Amendment Deed.
Court Disposition
Orders made for payment of interest and indemnity costs in favour of the plaintiff.
Orders
- Judgment for the plaintiff for interest in the amount of $33,005.
- Defendants ordered to pay plaintiff’s costs on an indemnity basis.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment