Soliman v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 1246

Soliman v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 1246

Leave to appeal and an extension of time were refused as there was no arguable case, no demonstrated jurisdictional error, and the Tribunal's decision was the only one open on the evidence; hence the application was dismissed with costs.

Source-derived case information.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
17 August 2018
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
['visa Applications' 'extension of Time' 'leave to Appeal' 'summary Dismissal' 'judicial Review']
['administrative Law'] ['visa Applications' 'extension of Time' 'leave to Appeal' 'summary Dismissal' 'judicial Review']

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether extension of time to apply for leave to appeal should be granted' 'Whether leave to appeal should be granted in relation to summary dismissal of judicial review application']

Ratio Decidendi

Leave to appeal and an extension of time were refused as there was no arguable case, no demonstrated jurisdictional error, and the Tribunal's decision was the only one open on the evidence; hence the application was dismissed with costs.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • ['The application be dismissed.' "The Applicant pay the First Respondent's costs."]