Ibrahim v Sellers Fabrics Pty Ltd [2023] NSWSC 1320
The Appeal Panel made an error of law and constructively failed to exercise jurisdiction by confirming a 30% deduction under s 323 for the plaintiff's Type 2 diabetes on the basis of genetic predisposition or susceptibility, without distinguishing between genetics causing increased susceptibility to diabetes and genetics causing a discernible level of impairment. Susceptibility is not impairment, and s 323 does not permit a deduction on that basis.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 November 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review; Common Law Administrative Law / Review of a Decision of the Medical Appeal Panel of the Personal Injury Commission
- Outcome
- Application for judicial review successful; the decision of the Appeal Panel was set aside and the matter referred to the President, Personal Injury Commission to be dealt with according to law.
- Legal Topics
- ['whole Person Impairment' 'type 2 Diabetes' 'pre Existing Condition or Abnormality' 'genetic Predisposition or Susceptibility' 'deduction Under S 323' 'error of Law' 'constructive Failure to Exercise Jurisdiction' 'referral to the President, Personal Injury Commission']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review; Common Law Administrative Law / Review of a Decision of the Medical Appeal Panel of the Personal Injury Commission
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Appeal Panel erred in confirming a 30% deduction for the plaintiff's diabetic condition under s 323 of the Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998 (NSW)." 'Whether a genetic predisposition or susceptibility to Type 2 diabetes is a pre-existing condition or abnormality permitting a deduction under s 323.' "Whether the Appeal Panel constructively failed to exercise jurisdiction by failing to engage meaningfully with the plaintiff's submissions."]
Ratio Decidendi
The Appeal Panel made an error of law and constructively failed to exercise jurisdiction by confirming a 30% deduction under s 323 for the plaintiff's Type 2 diabetes on the basis of genetic predisposition or susceptibility, without distinguishing between genetics causing increased susceptibility to diabetes and genetics causing a discernible level of impairment. Susceptibility is not impairment, and s 323 does not permit a deduction on that basis.
Court Disposition
Application for judicial review successful; the decision of the Appeal Panel was set aside and the matter referred to the President, Personal Injury Commission to be dealt with according to law.
Orders
- ['The decision of the Appeal Panel is set aside.' 'The matter is referred to the President, Personal Injury Commission to be dealt with according to law.' "The first defendant is to pay the plaintiff's costs."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment