Raad v Regina [2007] NSWCCA 311
On the whole of the evidence, including the identification and alibi evidence, it was open to the jury to conclude beyond reasonable doubt that the applicant was guilty. The weaknesses identified by the applicant concerning tattoos, build, and identification process did not undermine the reliability of the victim's...
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 November 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['appeal Against Conviction' 'robbery With Offensive Weapon' 'identification Evidence' 'alibi Evidence' 'unreasonable Verdict']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the verdict was unreasonable or not supported by the evidence' 'Reliability and sufficiency of identification evidence' 'Effect of alibi evidence on Crown case']
Ratio Decidendi
On the whole of the evidence, including the identification and alibi evidence, it was open to the jury to conclude beyond reasonable doubt that the applicant was guilty. The weaknesses identified by the applicant concerning tattoos, build, and identification process did not undermine the reliability of the victim's identification, and the jury was properly warned about the risks associated with identification evidence.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['Appeal be dismissed']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment