AIC16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 1178

AIC16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 1178

The one-day delay was short, the applicant appeared to have made an understandable mistake and did not intentionally disregard time limits, and the Court was not confident that the applicant had no reasonable prospects of success. Given the applicant was an unrepresented protection visa applicant, the Tribunal's reasons raised matters which could be explored on judicial review if properly argued, the consequences for the applicant were serious, and the delays in the proceeding had largely occurred through no fault of his, the interests of the administration of justice required that time be extended.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
13 August 2018
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time to Appeal From Federal Circuit Court Orders Dismissing a Judicial Review Application in a Migration Matter / Application for Extension of Time Granted
Outcome
Application for extension of time granted; applicant referred for pro bono legal assistance; first respondent's costs of the extension of time application reserved.
Legal Topics
['extension of Time to Appeal' 'protection Visa Refusal' 'administrative Appeals Tribunal Review' 'jurisdictional Error' 'interests of the Administration of Justice' 'pro Bono Referral']
['migration' 'administrative Law' 'judicial Review'] ['extension of Time to Appeal' 'protection Visa Refusal' 'administrative Appeals Tribunal Review' 'jurisdictional Error' 'interests of the Administration of Justice' 'pro Bono Referral']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Extension of Time to Appeal From Federal Circuit Court Orders Dismissing a Judicial Review Application in a Migration Matter / Application for Extension of Time Granted

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether time should be extended under r 36.05 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) for the applicant to appeal from the Federal Circuit Court's orders." "Whether the one-day delay and the applicant's explanation weighed against granting an extension of time." 'Whether the proposed appeal was so lacking in merit that no useful result could be obtained by granting an extension of time.' "Whether the interests of the administration of justice supported granting leave where the applicant was unrepresented and the Tribunal's reasons raised arguable issues."]

Ratio Decidendi

The one-day delay was short, the applicant appeared to have made an understandable mistake and did not intentionally disregard time limits, and the Court was not confident that the applicant had no reasonable prospects of success. Given the applicant was an unrepresented protection visa applicant, the Tribunal's reasons raised matters which could be explored on judicial review if properly argued, the consequences for the applicant were serious, and the delays in the proceeding had largely occurred through no fault of his, the interests of the administration of justice required that time be extended.

Court Disposition

Application for extension of time granted; applicant referred for pro bono legal assistance; first respondent's costs of the extension of time application reserved.

Orders

  • ['The time in which the applicant may file a notice of appeal is extended until 5 April 2018.' 'The draft notice of appeal filed on 5 April 2018 will stand as the notice of appeal in this proceeding.' 'The appellant has leave to file and serve an amended notice of appeal, on or before 4 pm on 21 September 2018, or...