Kumar v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 115
The appeal was dismissed pursuant to rule 36.75(1)(a)(i) due to the appellant's failure to appear at the hearing.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 February 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['migration Review' 'appeal Procedure' 'absence of Appellant']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Should the appeal be dismissed in the absence of the appellant?']
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed pursuant to rule 36.75(1)(a)(i) due to the appellant's failure to appear at the hearing.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['The appeal is dismissed.' "The appellant pay the first respondent's costs of the appeal."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment