AJG15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 1311
The applicant's explanation for delay was not entirely satisfactory and the proposed grounds for appeal lack merit as no jurisdictional error or misconstruction of the applicant's claims by the Tribunal or primary judge was identified. The application for extension of time was therefore dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 November 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Extension of Time to Appeal / Decision on Extension of Time
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- ['protection Visa' 'extension of Time' 'judicial Review' 'jurisdictional Error']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time to Appeal / Decision on Extension of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the explanation for delay in seeking appeal is satisfactory' 'Whether proposed appeal grounds have merit' "Whether the primary judge misconstrued the applicant's claims" 'Whether the Tribunal failed to consider relevant claims or made jurisdictional error']
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant's explanation for delay was not entirely satisfactory and the proposed grounds for appeal lack merit as no jurisdictional error or misconstruction of the applicant's claims by the Tribunal or primary judge was identified. The application for extension of time was therefore dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs
Orders
- ['The application be dismissed.' 'The applicant pay the costs of the first respondent, to be taxed if not agreed.' 'The name of the second respondent be amended to Administrative Appeals Tribunal.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment