Pathmanathan v Healthscope Operations Pty Ltd (No 2) [2020] FCA 503
Costs follow the event in federal proceedings under the Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986 (Cth) unless special circumstances justify a different order. No special circumstances were established by the applicant; thus the respondent is entitled to its costs, including those of interlocutory applications.
- Parties
- Applicant: Ajintha Pathmanathan; Respondent: Healthscope Operations Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 April 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under S. 46 PO of the Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986 (cth) / Costs Determination Following Summary Dismissal
- Outcome
- The applicant is to pay the respondent's costs of the proceeding, including costs of respective interlocutory applications, as agreed or assessed.
- Legal Topics
- Costs Order, Discrimination, Summary Dismissal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ajintha Pathmanathan
Applicant
Healthscope Operations Pty Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application Under S. 46 PO of the Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986 (cth) / Costs Determination Following Summary Dismissal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent is entitled to an order for costs following summary dismissal of the applicant's proceeding commenced under s. 46PO of the Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986 (Cth)
Ratio Decidendi
Costs follow the event in federal proceedings under the Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986 (Cth) unless special circumstances justify a different order. No special circumstances were established by the applicant; thus the respondent is entitled to its costs, including those of interlocutory applications.
Court Disposition
The applicant is to pay the respondent's costs of the proceeding, including costs of respective interlocutory applications, as agreed or assessed.
Orders
- The applicant pay the respondent's costs of this proceeding, including the costs of the applicant's interlocutory application filed on 7 October 2018 and the respondent's interlocutory application filed on 23 August 2019, as agreed or assessed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment