AJM18 v Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia [2023] FCA 1625
The application was dismissed because no jurisdictional error was established in the Federal Circuit Court’s refusal to extend time. The applicant gave written notice authorising documents to be sent to Ms Fu, the Tribunal acted in compliance with statutory provisions, and asserted procedural fairness grounds were not made out.
- Parties
- Applicant: AJM18; First Respondent: Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia; Second Respondent: Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs; Third Respondent: Administrative Appeals Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 December 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Judicial Review / Appellate
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Extension of Time, Procedural Fairness, Jurisdictional Error
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
AJM18
Applicant
Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
First Respondent
Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs
Second Respondent
Administrative Appeals Tribunal
Third Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Judicial Review / Appellate
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Federal Circuit Court committed jurisdictional error in refusing to extend time for filing an application for judicial review of a Tribunal decision
- 2 Whether the applicant authorised the Tribunal to communicate with another person for documents under s 441G of the Migration Act
- 3 Procedural fairness in Tribunal proceedings
Ratio Decidendi
The application was dismissed because no jurisdictional error was established in the Federal Circuit Court’s refusal to extend time. The applicant gave written notice authorising documents to be sent to Ms Fu, the Tribunal acted in compliance with statutory provisions, and asserted procedural fairness grounds were not made out.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs
Orders
- The application be dismissed.
- The Applicant pay the costs of the Second Respondent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment