AKINS and ORS v ABIGROUP LTD [1998] NSWCA 8
Client legal privilege attaching to witness statements served before trial in compliance with court orders is not lost; such service constitutes disclosure under compulsion of law within s122(2)(c) of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), and the protections afforded by rules and practice notes do not displace privilege.
- Parties
- Appellant: Akins; Respondent: Abigroup Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 June 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Client Legal Privilege, Access to Documents, Pre Trial Procedures, Discovery, Witness Statements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Akins
Appellant
Abigroup Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether client legal privilege attaching to witness statements is lost when statements are served before trial in compliance with court orders
- 2 Whether the principles of client legal privilege in the Evidence Act 1995 apply to ancillary processes such as discovery and pre-trial gathering of evidence
- 3 Whether the service of statements represents a disclosure 'under compulsion of law' within Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s122(2)(c)
Ratio Decidendi
Client legal privilege attaching to witness statements served before trial in compliance with court orders is not lost; such service constitutes disclosure under compulsion of law within s122(2)(c) of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), and the protections afforded by rules and practice notes do not displace privilege.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment