Hassanain v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2024] NSWCATAD 220
The applicant did not meet the requirement under the Instrument published pursuant to the Home Building Act 1989 (NSW) that industry experience must be gained as an employee of the holder of a contractor licence in general building work. The evidence established that during the relevant period, the applicant was employed by MLC Contractors Group, which did not hold such a licence, and was only assigned to work for KI Building Services (which did). Accordingly, the statutory criteria for a contractor licence were not met and the refusal of the application was affirmed.
- Parties
- Applicant: Akram Hassanain; Respondent: Commissioner for Fair Trading
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 August 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Review / Merits Review Determination
- Outcome
- Application refused; decision under review affirmed
- Legal Topics
- Contractor Licensing, Experience Requirements, Administrative Decisions, Employment Relationship in Licensing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Akram Hassanain
Applicant
Commissioner for Fair Trading
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Administrative Review / Merits Review Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant's industry experience was gained as an employee of the holder of a contractor licence in general building work as required by the Instrument under the Home Building Act 1989 (NSW)
- 2 Whether applicant could rely on additional unverified experience not included in the application
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant did not meet the requirement under the Instrument published pursuant to the Home Building Act 1989 (NSW) that industry experience must be gained as an employee of the holder of a contractor licence in general building work. The evidence established that during the relevant period, the applicant was employed by MLC Contractors Group, which did not hold such a licence, and was only assigned to work for KI Building Services (which did). Accordingly, the statutory criteria for a contractor licence were not met and the refusal of the application was affirmed.
Court Disposition
Application refused; decision under review affirmed
Orders
- The decision under review is affirmed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment