Akrivi Investments Pty Ltd v Marrickville Council [2015] NSWLEC 1145
The Court was satisfied that the decision based on the parties' agreement was one it could properly make under s 34(3) and therefore made final orders accordingly.
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 May 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Development Application, Class 1 Proceedings / Final Orders Following Conciliation Conference Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
- Outcome
- Proceedings disposed of in accordance with decision agreed by parties under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'conciliation Conference' 'section 34 Agreement' 'shop Top Housing Development']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Development Application, Class 1 Proceedings / Final Orders Following Conciliation Conference Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the proposed agreement is one the Court could make in the proper exercise of its functions under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court was satisfied that the decision based on the parties' agreement was one it could properly make under s 34(3) and therefore made final orders accordingly.
Court Disposition
Proceedings disposed of in accordance with decision agreed by parties under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.
Orders
- ['Final orders made on 13 May 2015 giving effect to the agreement between the parties; orders amended on 13 September 2017 under UCPR 36.17 (slip rule) to correct the number of dwellings in approved plans from 30 to 25.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
4 paragraphs
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Akrivi Investments Pty Ltd v Marrickville Council [2015] NSWLEC 1145 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 25 March 2015 Date of orders: 13 May 2015 Decision date: 13 May 2015 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Pearson C Decision: See (4) below Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: demolition of existing structures and construction of mixed use shop top housing development; conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Akrivi Investments Pty Ltd (Applicant) Marrickville Council (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Paul Jayne, HWL Ebsworth Lawyers (Applicant) Joe Strati, Marrickville Council (Respondent) File Number(s): 11045 of 2014
Judgment 1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to "dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision". 2. The Court Act also required me to "set out in writing the terms of the decision" (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document. 3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to, and have not, made any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties. 4. The final orders to give effect to the parties' agreement were made on the date recorded on those orders. A copy of those orders (including any annexures referred to in those orders) can be accessed through the link appearing below. The date of the orders appears on the first page of the orders. ……………. Commissioner Pearson 11045 of 2014 Pearson (Orders) (156 KB, pdf)
Amendments 13 September 2017 - Pursuant to UCPR 36.17, the slip rule, amend attached orders of 13 May 2015 to reflect approved plans - reference to 30 dwellings corrected to 25 dwellings. DISCLAIMER - Every effort has been made to comply with suppression orders or statutory provisions prohibiting publication that may apply to this judgment or decision. The onus remains on any person using material in the judgment or decision to ensure that the intended use of that material does not breach any such order or provision. Further enquiries may be directed to the Registry of the Court or Tribunal in which it was generated. Decision last updated: 13 September 2017