Aktar v R [2015] NSWCCA 123

Aktar v R [2015] NSWCCA 123

The applicant failed to demonstrate any error in the sentencing judge’s exercise of discretion in relation to accumulation of sentences, adjustment for special circumstances, application of s.21A(2)(eb), or assessment of objective seriousness; the sentences imposed were not manifestly excessive.

Parties
Applicant: Aktar Ali; Respondent Crown: Regina
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
29 May 2015
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
Leave to appeal is refused
Legal Topics
Appeal Against Sentence, Indecent Assault, Assessment of Objective Seriousness, Degree of Concurrency of Sentence, Special Circumstances in Sentencing, Application of Crimes (sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 S 21 A(2)(eb)

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 29 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Aktar Ali

Applicant

Regina

Respondent Crown

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence

  1. 1 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive
  2. 2 Whether the sentencing judge erred in ordering accumulation of sentences
  3. 3 Whether sufficient allowance was made for special circumstances under s.44(2) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to demonstrate any error in the sentencing judge’s exercise of discretion in relation to accumulation of sentences, adjustment for special circumstances, application of s.21A(2)(eb), or assessment of objective seriousness; the sentences imposed were not manifestly excessive.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal is refused

Orders

  • Leave to appeal is refused