Bond, Alan v Rozenes, Michael [1996] FCA 557
Section 275 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 authorises prosecution for bankruptcy offences even after annulment of bankruptcy; annulment does not expunge the status of bankruptcy for these purposes, and does not prevent investigation or prosecution for offences allegedly committed whilst bankrupt.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 June 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From a Judge of the Federal Court of Australia
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['bankruptcy Offences' 'annulment of Bankruptcy' 'judicial Review' 'mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters' 'ultra Vires and Abuse of Power']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From a Judge of the Federal Court of Australia
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether continuation of an investigation into alleged bankruptcy offences is lawful after the annulment of bankruptcy' 'Whether s275 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 permits prosecution for offences despite annulment of bankruptcy' 'Whether request for assistance to foreign authorities was ultra vires or unauthorised']
Ratio Decidendi
Section 275 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 authorises prosecution for bankruptcy offences even after annulment of bankruptcy; annulment does not expunge the status of bankruptcy for these purposes, and does not prevent investigation or prosecution for offences allegedly committed whilst bankrupt.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['The appeal be dismissed with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment