Walsh v KC & WL Brain Pty Ltd (No. 2) [2023] NSWDC 623
Leave to withdraw admissions was refused as no evidence or explanation was provided by the Defendant's directors for the instructions given to counsel; formal admissions made in court should not be withdrawn without sufficient cause or explanation, and this was not established.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Alan David Walsh; Defendant: KC & WL Brain Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 June 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory Applications
- Outcome
- Leave to withdraw admissions refused; leave to adduce further affidavit evidence granted; costs are Plaintiff's costs in the cause.
- Legal Topics
- Withdrawal of Admissions, Leave to Adduce Further Evidence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alan David Walsh
Plaintiff
KC & WL Brain Pty Ltd
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Applications
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant should be granted leave to withdraw admissions made by counsel in court
- 2 Whether the defendant should be granted leave to adduce further affidavit evidence relating to quantum
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to withdraw admissions was refused as no evidence or explanation was provided by the Defendant's directors for the instructions given to counsel; formal admissions made in court should not be withdrawn without sufficient cause or explanation, and this was not established.
Court Disposition
Leave to withdraw admissions refused; leave to adduce further affidavit evidence granted; costs are Plaintiff's costs in the cause.
Orders
- Leave to withdraw admissions concerning items in the Scott Schedule refused.
- Leave granted to Defendant to rely on further affidavit of Kenneth Charles Brain sworn 6 June 2023.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment