ALAN DAVIS MEDIA LIMITED v. LEICHHARDT MUNICIPAL COUNCIL (5 June 1998) [1998] NSWLEC 2
The addition of an advertising structure to the western wall of the Merton Estate Hotel is a legitimate 'use' of the building within the meaning of clause 15 of Leichhardt Local Environmental Plan No.20, and is permissible if conditions precedent are satisfied.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 June 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (class 1) Question of Law / Determination of Preliminary Question of Law Before Hearing on Merits
- Outcome
- Question of law answered in the affirmative; no order as to costs; returned to Registrar for hearing on merits.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Consent' 'interpretation of Local Environmental Plan' 'permissibility of Advertising Structures' 'clause 15 of LEP 20']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal (class 1) Question of Law / Determination of Preliminary Question of Law Before Hearing on Merits
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the proposed development at 38 Victoria Road, Rozelle is permissible pursuant to Clause 15 of Leichhardt Local Environmental Plan Number 20']
Ratio Decidendi
The addition of an advertising structure to the western wall of the Merton Estate Hotel is a legitimate 'use' of the building within the meaning of clause 15 of Leichhardt Local Environmental Plan No.20, and is permissible if conditions precedent are satisfied.
Court Disposition
Question of law answered in the affirmative; no order as to costs; returned to Registrar for hearing on merits.
Orders
- ['Question answered in the affirmative.' 'No order as to costs.' 'Exhibits may be returned.' 'Matter returned to Registrar for setting down for hearing on the merits, before an Assessor of the Court.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment