Delaney v R [2023] NSWCCA 181
The jury was entitled to find beyond reasonable doubt that the applicant's assault, including knee-blows to the deceased’s abdomen, caused the ruptured spleen resulting in death, and that the applicant intended to inflict grievous bodily harm; the alternative hypotheses of causation were not sufficiently supported by the evidence to render the verdict unsafe or unreasonable.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 July 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['appeal Against Conviction' 'murder' 'manslaughter' 'causation' 'intention' 'unreasonable Verdict']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the jury verdict was unreasonable or could not be supported having regard to the evidence within the meaning of s 6 of the Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW)' "Whether, on the evidence, the jury must have entertained a doubt that one or more blows inflicted by the applicant caused Mr Baxter's death" 'Whether, on the evidence, the jury must have entertained a doubt that the applicant intended either to kill Mr Baxter or to cause him grievous bodily harm']
Ratio Decidendi
The jury was entitled to find beyond reasonable doubt that the applicant's assault, including knee-blows to the deceased’s abdomen, caused the ruptured spleen resulting in death, and that the applicant intended to inflict grievous bodily harm; the alternative hypotheses of causation were not sufficiently supported by the evidence to render the verdict unsafe or unreasonable.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal out of time granted.' 'Leave to appeal granted.' 'Appeal dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment