Donald v Rail Corporation of New South Wales (No 4) [2015] NSWSC 1681
The report of Dr Adams is admitted into evidence as Exhibit G, with the order that the assumptions narrated in the report will stand only as evidence of the assumptions made and not as evidence of their truth, due to the basis rule and the need to determine at final hearing whether the facts ultimately proved are sufficiently like the assumptions used in the report.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Alan Donald; First Defendant: Rail Corporation of New South Wales; Second Defendant: Workers Compensation Nominal Insurer
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 November 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Procedural and Other Rulings / Evidentiary Objection During Trial
- Outcome
- Dr Adams report of 1 July 2010 is admitted as Exhibit G, with assumptions to stand only as evidence of assumptions made, not their truth.
- Legal Topics
- Admissibility of Expert Report, Basis Rule
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alan Donald
Plaintiff
Rail Corporation of New South Wales
First Defendant
Workers Compensation Nominal Insurer
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Procedural and Other Rulings / Evidentiary Objection During Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Dr Adams' expert report should be admitted into evidence given the basis rule
Ratio Decidendi
The report of Dr Adams is admitted into evidence as Exhibit G, with the order that the assumptions narrated in the report will stand only as evidence of the assumptions made and not as evidence of their truth, due to the basis rule and the need to determine at final hearing whether the facts ultimately proved are sufficiently like the assumptions used in the report.
Court Disposition
Dr Adams report of 1 July 2010 is admitted as Exhibit G, with assumptions to stand only as evidence of assumptions made, not their truth.
Orders
- Dr Adams report of 1 July 2010 is admitted as Exhibit G.
- The assumptions narrated by Dr Adams in his report will stand only as evidence of the assumptions he made and not as evidence of the truth of them.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment