IPL Datron Pty Ltd v McCoy [2003] NSWSC 526

IPL Datron Pty Ltd v McCoy [2003] NSWSC 526

The probabilities were that the Romalpa clause applied, so title to the relevant goods remained in the plaintiffs and the defendant was a fiduciary agent obliged to account for proceeds. Because additional evidence indicated the defendant would likely be unable to meet any damages claim at law, damages were not adequate and equity could grant declaratory relief and order an account.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
13 June 2003
Procedural Posture
Equity Division Commercial List Application Concerning Goods Delivered for Resale Under a Romalpa Clause / Judgment and Orders
Outcome
Those goods still with the defendant to be returned to the plaintiffs. Defendant to give an account of the sales he has made.
Legal Topics
['romalpa Clause' 'retention of Title' 'detinue' 'fiduciary Agency' 'account of Proceeds' 'adequacy of Damages']
['equity' 'torts' 'commercial Law'] ['romalpa Clause' 'retention of Title' 'detinue' 'fiduciary Agency' 'account of Proceeds' 'adequacy of Damages']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Equity Division Commercial List Application Concerning Goods Delivered for Resale Under a Romalpa Clause / Judgment and Orders

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether title to the goods remained in the plaintiffs under the Romalpa clause in the IPL Group of Companies Terms of Sale.' 'Whether common law remedies, including detinue and damages, were adequate or whether equity should intervene.' 'What relief should be ordered in respect of goods still held by the defendant and goods already sold.']

Ratio Decidendi

The probabilities were that the Romalpa clause applied, so title to the relevant goods remained in the plaintiffs and the defendant was a fiduciary agent obliged to account for proceeds. Because additional evidence indicated the defendant would likely be unable to meet any damages claim at law, damages were not adequate and equity could grant declaratory relief and order an account.

Court Disposition

Those goods still with the defendant to be returned to the plaintiffs. Defendant to give an account of the sales he has made.

Orders

  • ['The court declares that the first plaintiff is the beneficial owner of such of the goods described in schedule 1 of the amended summons as have not been duly sold by the defendant pursuant to his fiduciary agency, and the second plaintiff is the beneficial owner of the goods described in schedule 2, other than...