Alan Gerrard and Graham Kirchner v Mayne Nickless Limited & In the matter of an application for a Writ of Prohibition and a Writ of Certiorari against: The Hon Justice Munro of the Australian Industrial Relations Commission, First Respondent, Allan Gerrard & Others, Second to Twenty-ninth Respondents. Ex Parte: Manyne Nickless Limited & Sam Papa & Others v Finemores Pty Ltd [1996] IRCA 67

Alan Gerrard and Graham Kirchner v Mayne Nickless Limited & In the matter of an application for a Writ of Prohibition and a Writ of Certiorari against: The Hon Justice Munro of the Australian Industrial Relations Commission, First Respondent, Allan Gerrard & Others, Second to Twenty-ninth Respondents. Ex Parte: Manyne Nickless Limited & Sam Papa & Others v Finemores Pty Ltd [1996] IRCA 67

Termination of an independent contractor contract does not prevent the Commission from reviewing the contract or making orders under ss.127A–127B, including for contracts terminated before application; partnership contracts may fall within the statutory meaning of 'independent contractor'; interim orders imposing obligations after termination are valid if ancillary to preserving the position of parties; applications and orders made before legislative amendments remain enforceable under s.8 of the Acts Interpretation Act; constitutional challenge fails as review provisions constitute genuine adjustment of competing rights rather than an acquisition of property requiring just terms.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
05 March 1996
Procedural Posture
Appeal and Stated Case / Judgment Following Appeal, Stated Case Answers, and Review of Interlocutory Orders
Outcome
Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed; rule nisi motion dismissed; questions in stated case answered; matter remitted for determination.
Legal Topics
['independent Contractors' 'unfair Contracts' 'retrospective Legislative Effect' 'jurisdiction' 'statutory Interpretation' 'constitutional Law']
['industrial Law'] ['independent Contractors' 'unfair Contracts' 'retrospective Legislative Effect' 'jurisdiction' 'statutory Interpretation' 'constitutional Law']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal and Stated Case / Judgment Following Appeal, Stated Case Answers, and Review of Interlocutory Orders

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the Commission has jurisdiction over terminated contracts filed before or after termination' 'Whether the Commission can make orders regarding partnership independent contractors' 'Validity of interim orders imposing obligations after contract termination' 'Continuing jurisdiction post-legislative amendment' 'Survival of interim orders after a transfer of jurisdiction' 'Constitutional validity regarding acquisition of property under s.51(xxxi) of the Constitution']

Ratio Decidendi

Termination of an independent contractor contract does not prevent the Commission from reviewing the contract or making orders under ss.127A–127B, including for contracts terminated before application; partnership contracts may fall within the statutory meaning of 'independent contractor'; interim orders imposing obligations after termination are valid if ancillary to preserving the position of parties; applications and orders made before legislative amendments remain enforceable under s.8 of the Acts Interpretation Act; constitutional challenge fails as review provisions constitute genuine adjustment of competing rights rather than an acquisition of property requiring just terms.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed; rule nisi motion dismissed; questions in stated case answered; matter remitted for determination.

Orders

  • ['The respondent be granted leave to appeal against the interlocutory order of Northrop J of 8 February 1995.' 'The appeal be dismissed.' 'The notice of motion for a rule nisi be dismissed.' 'The questions asked in the case stated by the Full Bench of the Australian Industrial Relations Commission be answered: (a)...