Ghalaini v Canterbury-Bankstown Council [2016] NSWLEC 1590

Ghalaini v Canterbury-Bankstown Council [2016] NSWLEC 1590

Because the parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 and the Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, the Court disposed of the proceedings in accordance with that agreement by upholding the appeal and granting development consent subject to conditions.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
30 November 2016
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Development Application Appeal / Final Orders Following Conciliation Conference and Agreement Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Outcome
Appeal upheld; development consent granted to Development Application 59/2016 subject to conditions.
Legal Topics
['development Application' 'residential Flat Building' 'conciliation Conference' 'consent Orders' 'development Consent']
['planning and Environment Law'] ['development Application' 'residential Flat Building' 'conciliation Conference' 'consent Orders' 'development Consent']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Class 1 Development Application Appeal / Final Orders Following Conciliation Conference and Agreement Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the parties' agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 should be given effect by orders of the Court." 'Whether development consent should be granted to Development Application 59/2016 subject to conditions.']

Ratio Decidendi

Because the parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 and the Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, the Court disposed of the proceedings in accordance with that agreement by upholding the appeal and granting development consent subject to conditions.

Court Disposition

Appeal upheld; development consent granted to Development Application 59/2016 subject to conditions.

Orders

  • ['The applicant is granted leave to amend the development application to rely on the amended plans and documents listed at condition 5 of the conditions of consent at Annexure "A" herein.' 'The appeal is upheld.' 'Development consent is granted to Development Application 59/2016 for the demolition of the existing...