Hewit v NSW State Coroner [2019] NSWSC 1724
There was no reputable evidence to challenge the certified cause of death or to suggest the death was 'unknown', 'suspicious', 'unusual', or 'unnatural'. No error of law was shown in the Coroner's refusal to hold an inquest and the interests of justice did not support ordering an inquest.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 December 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Declaratory Relief and Orders in Relation to Coronial Jurisdiction / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Further amended summons dismissed; relief refused.
- Legal Topics
- ['reportable Death' 'coroner Jurisdiction' 'interests of Justice' 'declaratory Relief' 'error of Law']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Declaratory Relief and Orders in Relation to Coronial Jurisdiction / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether Ms Hewit's death was a 'reportable death' under s 6(1)(b) or s 6(1)(c) of the Coroners Act 2009 (NSW)" 'Whether the Coroner had jurisdiction under s 21 of the Coroners Act to hold an inquest' 'Whether the Supreme Court should order an inquest under s 84 of the Coroners Act' "Whether there was an error of law in the Coroner's decision"]
Ratio Decidendi
There was no reputable evidence to challenge the certified cause of death or to suggest the death was 'unknown', 'suspicious', 'unusual', or 'unnatural'. No error of law was shown in the Coroner's refusal to hold an inquest and the interests of justice did not support ordering an inquest.
Court Disposition
Further amended summons dismissed; relief refused.
Orders
- ['The further amended summons is dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment