Shaw v R [2010] NSWCCA 23
The Court found the sentencing judge intended to account for presentence custody but failed to account for an additional recognised period of 12 days; thus, the appeal should be upheld and the sentences adjusted accordingly. No separate discount for assistance to authorities was warranted as it was adequately reflected in the Queensland sentence.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 February 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed. Sentences quashed and re-sentenced as specified.
- Legal Topics
- ['appeal Against Sentence' 'assistance to Authorities' 'presentence Custody' 'totality Principle']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the sentencing judge erred by not granting a more lenient sentence for assistance to authorities' 'Whether the sentencing judge failed to take into account a period of presentence custody']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found the sentencing judge intended to account for presentence custody but failed to account for an additional recognised period of 12 days; thus, the appeal should be upheld and the sentences adjusted accordingly. No separate discount for assistance to authorities was warranted as it was adequately reflected in the Queensland sentence.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed. Sentences quashed and re-sentenced as specified.
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal granted and the appeal upheld.' 'The sentences imposed in the District Court are quashed and the following sentences imposed:' 'Count 1 – imprisonment for a fixed term of 18 months commencing on 20 November 2004 and expiring on 19 May 2006.' 'Count 2 – imprisonment for a fixed term of 3 years...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment