Neeves v Gaffey [2016] NSWCATAP 135

Neeves v Gaffey [2016] NSWCATAP 135

The Appeal Panel refused leave to extend time for appeal because the applicants' delay was not adequately explained, their prospects of success were weak on the merits (including on the issue of Tribunal power to order repayment of water charges and award compensation for malfunctioning facilities), and there was no substantial miscarriage of justice warranting intervention.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
17 June 2016
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Leave to Appeal Out of Time; Appeal Determination
Outcome
Leave to extend time refused; appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
['leave to Appeal Out of Time' 'repayment of Water Usage Charges' 'compensation for Failure of Facilities' 'obligations of Landlord and Tenant']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Leave to Appeal Out of Time; Appeal Determination

  1. 1 ['Whether leave to appeal out of time should be granted' 'Whether the Tribunal had power to order repayment of water usage charges to tenants' 'Whether compensation for non-functioning dishwasher and clothes hoist was appropriate' 'Whether the Tribunal erred in failing to address certain landlord compensation claims']

Ratio Decidendi

The Appeal Panel refused leave to extend time for appeal because the applicants' delay was not adequately explained, their prospects of success were weak on the merits (including on the issue of Tribunal power to order repayment of water charges and award compensation for malfunctioning facilities), and there was no substantial miscarriage of justice warranting intervention.

Court Disposition

Leave to extend time refused; appeal dismissed

Orders

  • ['Leave to extend the time in which to lodge the Notice of Appeal is refused.' 'The appeal is otherwise dismissed.']