Regina v Li [2002] NSWCCA 215

Regina v Li [2002] NSWCCA 215

Leave to appeal was refused because there was no error identified in the trial judge's reasoning, findings were based on oral evidence, and the interests of justice did not require intervention at this stage.

Source-derived case information.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
22 May 2002
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal From Interlocutory Decision
Outcome
Leave to appeal refused
Legal Topics
['interlocutory Appeals' 'stay of Indictment']
['criminal Law'] ['interlocutory Appeals' 'stay of Indictment']

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal From Interlocutory Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether leave to appeal should be granted from the interlocutory decision refusing a permanent stay of indictment']

Ratio Decidendi

Leave to appeal was refused because there was no error identified in the trial judge's reasoning, findings were based on oral evidence, and the interests of justice did not require intervention at this stage.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal refused

Orders

  • ['Leave to appeal refused']