Hyman v Conway [2007] NSWSC 828
The proceedings before the court constituted the completion of a discrete aspect of the litigation, and there was no proper basis to depart from the usual rule that costs follow the event. Any shortening of the hearing due to the defendants' admission can be reflected in the quantum of costs ordered against them.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Alan Winston Hyman; First Defendant: Roger Malcolm Conway; Second Defendant: Showcase Publications Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 July 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Costs Determination After Compromise of Proceedings
- Outcome
- Defendants ordered to pay plaintiff's costs.
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Injunctions, Non Competition, Share Purchase Agreement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alan Winston Hyman
Plaintiff
Roger Malcolm Conway
First Defendant
Showcase Publications Pty Ltd
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Costs Determination After Compromise of Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether costs should follow the event after compromise of proceedings
- 2 Whether there is justification to depart from the usual rule on costs due to defendants' admission and shortening of proceedings
Ratio Decidendi
The proceedings before the court constituted the completion of a discrete aspect of the litigation, and there was no proper basis to depart from the usual rule that costs follow the event. Any shortening of the hearing due to the defendants' admission can be reflected in the quantum of costs ordered against them.
Court Disposition
Defendants ordered to pay plaintiff's costs.
Orders
- Orders made in terms of paragraphs 1 to 4 and 6 of the summons.
- Defendants to pay the plaintiff's costs of today's proceedings.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment