Guo v CTTT & Anor [2007] NSWSC 1335
The plaintiff was afforded procedural fairness as required by the CTTT Act. The Tribunal Member properly applied the principles of s 13 of the Consumer Claims Act 1998 and gave sufficient reasons. No error of law was established.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Alan Xiong Guo; First Defendant: Consumer Trader and Tenancy Tribunal; Second Defendant: George Behjan by his tutor Ramon Behjan
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 November 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; Tribunal's decision affirmed; amended summons dismissed; plaintiff to pay defendant's costs
- Legal Topics
- Procedural Fairness, Appeals, Consumer Claims, Jurisdiction of Tribunal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alan Xiong Guo
Plaintiff
Consumer Trader and Tenancy Tribunal
First Defendant
George Behjan by his tutor Ramon Behjan
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff was denied procedural fairness in the Tribunal
- 2 Whether the Tribunal Member erred in the application of s 13 of the Consumer Claims Act 1998 (NSW)
- 3 Whether sufficient reasons were provided by the Tribunal Member
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff was afforded procedural fairness as required by the CTTT Act. The Tribunal Member properly applied the principles of s 13 of the Consumer Claims Act 1998 and gave sufficient reasons. No error of law was established.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; Tribunal's decision affirmed; amended summons dismissed; plaintiff to pay defendant's costs
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed
- The decision of Tribunal Member Borsody dated 16 April 2007 is affirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment