Blacktown City Council v Aland B & W Pty Ltd [2022] NSWLC 15

Blacktown City Council v Aland B & W Pty Ltd [2022] NSWLC 15

Given the scale of pollution, repeated warnings without adequate measures, significant sediment present, and delay in implementing controls, the offences, while in the mid range of seriousness, warranted substantial penalties. Early guilty plea justified a 25% discount but did not outweigh the seriousness, scale of construction activity and failure to act swiftly after notification.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
29 July 2022
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentence
Outcome
Conviction; fines imposed for both charges; costs ordered.
Legal Topics
['pollute Waters' 'water Pollution Offences' 'sentencing Corporate Offenders' 'protection of Waterways']
['criminal Law' 'environmental Law'] ['pollute Waters' 'water Pollution Offences' 'sentencing Corporate Offenders' 'protection of Waterways']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Appropriate penalty for corporate offender convicted of polluting waters under s 120 Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 (NSW)' 'Assessment of objective seriousness for water pollution offences' 'Mitigation for early plea of guilty' 'Assessment of actual and potential environmental harm']

Ratio Decidendi

Given the scale of pollution, repeated warnings without adequate measures, significant sediment present, and delay in implementing controls, the offences, while in the mid range of seriousness, warranted substantial penalties. Early guilty plea justified a 25% discount but did not outweigh the seriousness, scale of construction activity and failure to act swiftly after notification.

Court Disposition

Conviction; fines imposed for both charges; costs ordered.

Orders

  • ['Fine of $67,500 for Sequence 1 (after 25% discount)' 'Fine of $75,000 for Sequence 2 (after 25% discount)' 'Total fines imposed: $142,500' "Defendant to pay prosecution's legal costs agreed at $12,000"]