Alanto Investments Pty Ltd v Randwick City Council [2000] NSWLEC 74
The application to modify the original consent to include a strata plan is refused because the plan did not exist at the time of consent, no error or omission within s 96(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 was established, and the approval sought is under a different legislative regime.
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 April 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Modification of Development Consent Proceedings / Judgment on Application to Modify Development Consent
- Outcome
- Application for modification refused.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Consent' 'modification of Consent' 'strata Subdivision']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Modification of Development Consent Proceedings / Judgment on Application to Modify Development Consent
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether development consent modification may include approval of an additional strata plan under separate legislation' 'Whether omission of strata plan can be corrected as minor error, misdescription or miscalculation under s 96(1) Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979']
Ratio Decidendi
The application to modify the original consent to include a strata plan is refused because the plan did not exist at the time of consent, no error or omission within s 96(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 was established, and the approval sought is under a different legislative regime.
Court Disposition
Application for modification refused.
Orders
- ['Application for modification of orders made on 3 March 1995 as modified by orders dated 10 December 1996 is refused.' 'Exhibits may be returned.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment