Langer, Albert v Australian Electoral Commission [1996] FCA 195
Section 240 of the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 requires marking ballot papers with consecutive numbers for each candidate without repetition; appellant's conduct in encouraging otherwise is prohibited by s.329A, and the Supreme Court properly exercised discretion to grant an injunction restraining such conduct during the election period.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 March 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment After Hearing on Appeal From Supreme Court of Victoria
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed (except for jurisdictional question regarding contempt proceeding).
- Legal Topics
- ['preferential Voting' 'injunctions' 'statutory Interpretation' 'compulsory Voting']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment After Hearing on Appeal From Supreme Court of Victoria
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Proper construction of s.240 of the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 regarding marking of ballot papers' "Whether appellant's conduct was prohibited by s.329A of the Commonwealth Electoral Act" 'Whether an injunction should have been granted under s.383 of the Commonwealth Electoral Act']
Ratio Decidendi
Section 240 of the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 requires marking ballot papers with consecutive numbers for each candidate without repetition; appellant's conduct in encouraging otherwise is prohibited by s.329A, and the Supreme Court properly exercised discretion to grant an injunction restraining such conduct during the election period.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed (except for jurisdictional question regarding contempt proceeding).
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal granted (insofar as necessary)' 'Appeal against orders made by Supreme Court on 8 February 1996 dismissed, except as to jurisdiction concerning contempt proceeding']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment