Ling v Wu; Ling v Pan Pac Investment Pty Limited (No 3) [2015] NSWSC 1550
The responsibility for delay in resolving the dispute is substantially on Ms Wu, so there is no basis to backdate the commencement of interest after judgment before 14 August 2015; the apportionment of costs (75% payable by Mr Ling) appropriately reflects the respective success and failures of the parties at hearing.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Albert Ling; Defendant: Yan Wu; Defendant: Pan Pac Investment Pty Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 October 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Post Substantive Judgment; Determination of Remaining Issues Regarding Interest and Costs
- Outcome
- Orders made for parties to file agreed draft formal orders and to schedule a final hearing for dispositive orders.
- Legal Topics
- Judgment and Orders, Interest After Judgment, Apportionment of Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Albert Ling
Plaintiff
Yan Wu
Defendant
Pan Pac Investment Pty Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Post Substantive Judgment; Determination of Remaining Issues Regarding Interest and Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the date upon which interest after judgment commences should be varied
- 2 Whether the plaintiff should pay a proportion of the costs of the defendant
Ratio Decidendi
The responsibility for delay in resolving the dispute is substantially on Ms Wu, so there is no basis to backdate the commencement of interest after judgment before 14 August 2015; the apportionment of costs (75% payable by Mr Ling) appropriately reflects the respective success and failures of the parties at hearing.
Court Disposition
Orders made for parties to file agreed draft formal orders and to schedule a final hearing for dispositive orders.
Orders
- The parties are to prepare and file draft formal orders to give effect to this judgment, such orders to be agreed if possible.
- The parties are to approach my Associate jointly and promptly in order to set a mutually convenient date, within three weeks of today, for the making of formal dispositive orders in the matter.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment