Alcan Australia Ltd v. Australian Building Construction Employees & Builders Labourers Federation & Ors [1984] FCA 112
A sufficient case for interlocutory relief was made out; it is within the Court's power to make the President of the Conciliation and Arbitration Commission aware of a dispute under para 88DC(1)(e); immediate orders are necessary given the seriousness of the situation, subject to action by the Commission and...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Applicant: ALCAN AUSTRALIA LIMITED; First Respondent: AUSTRALIAN BUILDING CONSTRUCTION EMPLOYEES AND BUILDERS LABOURERS' FEDERATION; Second Respondent: NORMAN GALLAGHER; Third Respondent: NORMAN RUST; Fourth Respondent: NORMAN WALLACE; Fifth Respondent: STEVE BLACK; Sixth Respondent: HARRY NOWICKI
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 April 1984
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Interlocutory Orders / Interlocutory Proceedings
- Outcome
- Application stood over for further mention; President of Commission to be notified; orders made for filing and service of affidavits; costs reserved.
- Legal Topics
- Secondary Boycott, Interlocutory Injunctions, Demarcation Disputes, Conciliation Procedure
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
ALCAN AUSTRALIA LIMITED
Applicant
AUSTRALIAN BUILDING CONSTRUCTION EMPLOYEES AND BUILDERS LABOURERS' FEDERATION
First Respondent
NORMAN GALLAGHER
Second Respondent
NORMAN RUST
Third Respondent
NORMAN WALLACE
Fourth Respondent
STEVE BLACK
Fifth Respondent
HARRY NOWICKI
Sixth Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Interlocutory Orders / Interlocutory Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether interlocutory orders should be granted for alleged contravention or threatened contravention of s.45D Trade Practices Act 1974
- 2 Whether the Court may make the President of the Australian Conciliation and Arbitration Commission aware of the dispute under s.88DC(1)(e)
Ratio Decidendi
A sufficient case for interlocutory relief was made out; it is within the Court's power to make the President of the Conciliation and Arbitration Commission aware of a dispute under para 88DC(1)(e); immediate orders are necessary given the seriousness of the situation, subject to action by the Commission and parties' filings.
Court Disposition
Application stood over for further mention; President of Commission to be notified; orders made for filing and service of affidavits; costs reserved.
Orders
- President of the Australian Conciliation and Arbitration Commission to be notified of the dispute.
- Registrar to notify the Minister for Employment and Industrial Relations.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment