Alessa Pty Limited -v- Total & Universal Pty Limited (RLD) [2002] NSWADTAP 16
The Tribunal was entitled to award costs against the appellant based on special circumstances, including the appellant's disregard of legal advice, the lack of arguable claim under the Retail Leases Act 1994, and conduct unfair to the respondent. Mediation advice was deemed inadmissible and not a material error; the procedure followed did not deny procedural fairness.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 May 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Appeal Panel Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['costs' 'procedural Fairness' 'retail Leases' 'tribunal Jurisdiction']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Appeal Panel Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Tribunal erred in awarding costs against the appellant under 'special circumstances'" 'Whether evidence from mediation was admissible for costs application' "Clarification and application of the test for 'vexatious' proceedings" 'Whether procedural fairness was denied in new evidence consideration']
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal was entitled to award costs against the appellant based on special circumstances, including the appellant's disregard of legal advice, the lack of arguable claim under the Retail Leases Act 1994, and conduct unfair to the respondent. Mediation advice was deemed inadmissible and not a material error; the procedure followed did not deny procedural fairness.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['Appeal dismissed' "Appellant to pay the respondent's costs of the appeal"]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment