Vella v Annous [2008] NSWSC 509
No orders need be made as the matter has been settled as against the relevant defendants; actions against other defendants not pursued.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Alessio Emanuel Vella; First Defendant: Hassam Annous; Third Defendant: Vanessa Tsokos
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 May 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment
- Outcome
- no order made
- Legal Topics
- Money Had and Received, Settlement, Orders Following Settlement
Equity Money Had and Received Settlement Orders Following Settlement
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 5
Parties
Alessio Emanuel Vella
Plaintiff
Hassam Annous
First Defendant
Vanessa Tsokos
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether orders should be made in light of settlement between parties
- 2 Claims for money had and received against several defendants
Ratio Decidendi
No orders need be made as the matter has been settled as against the relevant defendants; actions against other defendants not pursued.
Court Disposition
no order made
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment