Kirzner v Jetmaster Fireplaces Aust Pty Ltd [2021] NSWCATAP 255

Kirzner v Jetmaster Fireplaces Aust Pty Ltd [2021] NSWCATAP 255

The Appeal Panel held that the Tribunal was entitled to prefer the first-hand evidence of the installer, Mr Brownlow, that no jackhammer was used, over the Alpha Report's opinion that depended on jackhammering having occurred. Once that factual premise was rejected, the Alpha Report had no reliable foundation and the appellant failed to establish causation or any failure by the respondents. The telephone hearing did not deny the appellant procedural fairness because he had a reasonable opportunity to present his case and the Member's interventions were ordinary case-management directions. The decision was not shown to be unfair, inequitable, or against the weight of the evidence, so leave...

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
30 August 2021
Procedural Posture
Internal Appeal Under S 80(2) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 From a Consumer and Commercial Division Home Building Decision / Appeal Panel Decision on Leave to Appeal and Appeal
Outcome
Leave to appeal refused; appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
['internal Appeal' 'leave to Appeal' 'findings of Fact' 'expert Evidence' 'weight of Evidence' 'procedural Fairness' 'tribunal Jurisdiction' 'major Defect']
['administrative Law' 'home Building' 'consumer and Commercial Law'] ['internal Appeal' 'leave to Appeal' 'findings of Fact' 'expert Evidence' 'weight of Evidence' 'procedural Fairness' 'tribunal Jurisdiction' 'major Defect']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Internal Appeal Under S 80(2) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 From a Consumer and Commercial Division Home Building Decision / Appeal Panel Decision on Leave to Appeal and Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Did the Tribunal give insufficient weight to the Alpha Report?' 'Was the appellant denied procedural fairness?' 'Should leave to appeal be granted?' 'Did the Tribunal have jurisdiction to hear the claim under the Home Building Act 1989?ሀ']

Ratio Decidendi

The Appeal Panel held that the Tribunal was entitled to prefer the first-hand evidence of the installer, Mr Brownlow, that no jackhammer was used, over the Alpha Report's opinion that depended on jackhammering having occurred. Once that factual premise was rejected, the Alpha Report had no reliable foundation and the appellant failed to establish causation or any failure by the respondents. The telephone hearing did not deny the appellant procedural fairness because he had a reasonable opportunity to present his case and the Member's interventions were ordinary case-management directions. The decision was not shown to be unfair, inequitable, or against the weight of the evidence, so leave...

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal refused; appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • ['Leave to appeal refused.' 'Appeal dismissed.']